McGraw Hill Textbook Authors Are Ready to Rumble Over Royalties

A pedestrian passes in front of the Daniel Patrick Moynihan U.S. District Court for the Southern District of New York Courthouse in New York, U.S., on Monday, Dec. 21, 2020. With vaccinations heralding a return to normalcy, the next year should see courtrooms around the world coming back to life. Ghislaine Maxwell, China critic Jimmy Lai and Samsung heir Jay Y. Lee are among those facing high-profile criminal cases in 2021. Photographer: Michael Nagle/Bloomberg
A pedestrian passes in front of the Daniel Patrick Moynihan U.S. District Court for the Southern District of New York Courthouse in New York, U.S., on Monday, Dec. 21, 2020. With vaccinations heralding a return to normalcy, the next year should see courtrooms around the world coming back to life. Ghislaine Maxwell, China critic Jimmy Lai and Samsung heir Jay Y. Lee are among those facing high-profile criminal cases in 2021. Photographer: Michael Nagle/Bloomberg (Michael Nagle/)

(Bloomberg) — McGraw Hill LLC was sued by textbook authors who claim the company has slashed their royalties by unilaterally revising the rules for how they get paid for online versions of their work.Three of the authors filed a proposed class-action lawsuit against the publisher Friday, saying the new rules violate the terms of their contracts and will reduce their royalties by 25% to 35%.The change involves the way the authors are paid for sales of textbooks and related study materials on McGraw Hill’s online site, Connect. Approximately 53% of McGraw Hill’s billings come from digital products, according to the complaint, which says the company and its affiliates reported total revenue of more than $1.5 billion in 2019.

The company used to pay royalties on the “entirety of revenues” from textbook sales on Connect, but recently announced it would only pay for a portion of the sales, the authors say in the complaint, which was filed in Manhattan federal court. “This maneuver amounts to a bald attempt by McGraw Hill to pass its Connect-related costs to authors.”

McGraw Hill didn’t immediately respond to an email seeking comment after regular business hours.

The case is Flynn v. McGraw Hill LLC, 21-cv-00614, U.S. District Court, Southern District of New York (Manhattan).

Share on facebook
Facebook
Share on twitter
Twitter
Share on linkedin
LinkedIn
Share on whatsapp
WhatsApp
Share on email
Email